{
  "kind": "manually-reviewed-synthetic-example",
  "version": 1,
  "report": {
    "kicker": "SYNTHETIC REVIEW EXAMPLE",
    "title": "Sales increased; the cause is unconfirmed",
    "lede": "Invented Lantern Workshop reports September sales of AUD 84,000 and profit of AUD 18,400. The supplied files support the copied figures and comparison with August. They do not establish why sales rose or whether cash reconciles.",
    "facts": [
      {
        "label": "September sales",
        "value": "AUD 84,000",
        "source": "invented-ledger.csv, logical record 2, column 2"
      },
      {
        "label": "September wages",
        "value": "AUD 31,000",
        "source": "invented-ledger.csv, logical record 3, column 2"
      },
      {
        "label": "September profit",
        "value": "AUD 18,400",
        "source": "invented-ledger.csv, logical record 4, column 2"
      }
    ],
    "sections": [
      {
        "num": "01",
        "title": "What the supplied figures support",
        "body": "Sales rose by AUD 5,000 from August to September: 84,000 minus 79,000. Wages rose by AUD 500 and profit rose by AUD 2,300. These calculations compare the supplied periods and do not reconcile a ledger.",
        "expandables": []
      },
      {
        "num": "02",
        "title": "What the reviewer corrected",
        "body": "The hypothetical draft attributed higher sales to an exhibition. The notes record that an exhibition occurred but contain no attribution evidence. The reviewed wording leaves the cause unconfirmed.",
        "expandables": []
      },
      {
        "num": "03",
        "title": "What is missing and what to ask",
        "body": "No bank statement or cash reconciliation was supplied. Profit is not cash. Ask for a sales breakdown and evidence of the exhibition effect before drawing a causal conclusion. These are manual review questions, not financial advice.",
        "expandables": []
      }
    ]
  },
  "inputHashes": {
    "invented-ledger.csv": "86671e86ff430138326524cbff2377816dd274e38bdddf3f9b7d9634fd0bc1aa",
    "period-notes.txt": "0f7cbabf425ab8b0223aed81d086d7658b3612122cebe48c610777ec10dac2f7"
  },
  "limitations": [
    "Not a customer case or recorded model run",
    "No bank statement or cash reconciliation",
    "No causal sales explanation established",
    "Public example downloads have no recipient controls"
  ],
  "reviewRecord": "SYNTHETIC REVIEW RECORD\nEvery company, number and note is invented. This is a manually authored demonstration, not a customer case or a recorded model run.\n1. Confirm source: four logical CSV records including the header; three metrics and two periods. AUD, accrual, September 2026.\n2. Reject the hypothetical draft claim: \"The exhibition caused sales to rise.\" The inputs do not establish causation.\n3. Keep copied figures: September sales AUD 84,000; wages AUD 31,000; profit AUD 18,400.\n4. Calculate sales difference 84,000 minus 79,000 = 5,000. This is arithmetic, not an explanation.\n5. Keep missing bank statement/cash reconciliation visible. Profit is not cash.\n6. Request sales breakdown and exhibition evidence. Do not recommend investment or financial actions from this sample.\n7. Freeze the reviewed example output. Public downloads have no recipient controls; they are safe because the inputs are invented.\nYour own upload can produce different wording; independently review facts, omissions, source locations and explanations before release.\n"
}